As climbers we often spend a lot of time disagreeing about seemingly unimportant things. Is that route 5.12a or just hard 5.11d? Is using your knee on a topout a dab that nullifies an ascent or no? What constitutes good style when it comes to placing gear and hanging draws? Despite all these disagreements, one subject that most climbers agree on is that of paying to climb outdoors. Next to climbing being banned altogether (or restricted as in Hueco), the next worst thing to most climbers is having to pay to access it.
I came to thinking of this issue after my recent trip to the Gunks where it costs $15 per person per day to climb (other activities are cheaper)! I was also at Horse Pens 40 this fall where it costs $10 per person per day for climbing and camping. Closer to home, one must have a State Park sticker in order to climb at Devil’s Lake State Park which costs a more affordable $25 per year for one vehicle. I also remember reading recently that the cost of climbing at Eldorado Canyon in Colorado will be going up sharply in 2008. Contrast this with areas like those in Bishop and the Red River Gorge where there is basically an unlimited amount of climbing available at no direct cost to climbers. Ironically the one area that used to ask for donations at the Red, Torrent Falls, closed last year due to landowner unrest over the sense of entitlement displayed by climbers, many of whom no doubt balked at the $2 donations requested.
High Exposure at the Gunks – It will (only?) cost you and your partner $30 to experience this high

It seems as though the future holds only increased costs for climbers. More and more people climbing has led to increased impact on many areas like Indian Creek among others, and imposing user fees seems like it might be a necessary evil to maintain access to these sorts of areas.
The sense of entitlement that we climbers as a user group sometimes have is well documented, and it seems as though the issue of paying to climb outdoors is just another symptom of this. I personally have never had much of a problem paying to climb. However, I don’t do that much climbing outdoors so any opportunity is a good one no matter the cost, and I spend 40 hours a week sitting at a desk so I can afford to do these sorts of things. I’m sure feelings are much different for those that spend a great deal of time climbing outdoors.
So what does everyone else think? Do we have a certain basic right to access these generally wild and undeveloped lands for free? Does paying to climb at a particular area affect where you go climbing? Is there a certain threshold after which the cost is too much? I haven’t gone on any long trips in a long time so I would be interested to hear what it is like for people on extended climbing trips as well. Take the poll and leave a comment with your thoughts.







Pingback: Paying to Climb Outdoors Follow-up | Climbing Narcissist