<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Issue 2 Of Deadpoint Magazine Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/</link>
	<description>So obsessed with climbing it hurts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Situner</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>Situner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1828#comment-4063</guid>
		<description>I like it.

I was a little on the fence after the first issue, but the fact that back issues are readily availible online ANYTIME and the thing is FREE I can hardly complain.

It was a bold idea, and I hope that they can keep it going and make it work.

Could you imagine if Climbing, Urban Climber, and Rock &amp; Ice were someday fully availible online!?!?

If this keeps it up, it will be setting the standard in a new arena.

I give it A+ and my endorsement.

(which admittedly means almost nothing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.</p>
<p>I was a little on the fence after the first issue, but the fact that back issues are readily availible online ANYTIME and the thing is FREE I can hardly complain.</p>
<p>It was a bold idea, and I hope that they can keep it going and make it work.</p>
<p>Could you imagine if Climbing, Urban Climber, and Rock &amp; Ice were someday fully availible online!?!?</p>
<p>If this keeps it up, it will be setting the standard in a new arena.</p>
<p>I give it A+ and my endorsement.</p>
<p>(which admittedly means almost nothing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sock hands</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>sock hands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1828#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>i haven&#039;t read it yet, but i always thought that &quot;jumbo love&quot; was a PC cop-out since the other major line is jumbo pumping hate.... guess &quot;jumbo pumping love&quot; would be too over the top?

do they mention this in the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i haven&#8217;t read it yet, but i always thought that &#8220;jumbo love&#8221; was a PC cop-out since the other major line is jumbo pumping hate&#8230;. guess &#8220;jumbo pumping love&#8221; would be too over the top?</p>
<p>do they mention this in the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1828#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>I kinda thought the first edition was ho-hum but this one I enjoyed.  I like the format and embedded videos-- great idea.  A couple kinda naughty photos catch your attention too.  You know what I&#039;m referring to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda thought the first edition was ho-hum but this one I enjoyed.  I like the format and embedded videos&#8211; great idea.  A couple kinda naughty photos catch your attention too.  You know what I&#8217;m referring to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4037</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1828#comment-4037</guid>
		<description>i agree. relieving. the jumbo love comment was HILARIOUS (particularly because I&#039;d never even considered its significance until then).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. relieving. the jumbo love comment was HILARIOUS (particularly because I&#8217;d never even considered its significance until then).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevlar</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>kevlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1828#comment-4036</guid>
		<description>I read the whole magazine, and i felt like the sex article was pretty vulgar. Im not saying I didnt like it because i certainly did. I think i could feel this way because most of the climbing articles you read are pretty clean cut? 

Did anyone else feel this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the whole magazine, and i felt like the sex article was pretty vulgar. Im not saying I didnt like it because i certainly did. I think i could feel this way because most of the climbing articles you read are pretty clean cut? </p>
<p>Did anyone else feel this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/12/deadpoint-magazine-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1828#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>I personally love it, I think it is the way magazines should be done, informative and interactive, easy to maneuver without pushing ads down your throat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally love it, I think it is the way magazines should be done, informative and interactive, easy to maneuver without pushing ads down your throat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

