<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News &amp; Notes &#8211; 10/1/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/</link>
	<description>So obsessed with climbing it hurts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narc</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/comment-page-1/#comment-3059</link>
		<dc:creator>Narc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1149#comment-3059</guid>
		<description>word, give us a call to discuss details, we won&#039;t be in the gym much before we leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>word, give us a call to discuss details, we won&#8217;t be in the gym much before we leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1149#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>Yep. The swelling is way down (I can see my ankle bone again) and I&#039;ve been doing my PT exercises, so I&#039;ve reconsidered my decision not to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. The swelling is way down (I can see my ankle bone again) and I&#8217;ve been doing my PT exercises, so I&#8217;ve reconsidered my decision not to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narc</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/comment-page-1/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator>Narc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1149#comment-3057</guid>
		<description>Quite possibly.  Are you feeling less broken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite possibly.  Are you feeling less broken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1149#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>Do you still have room in your car for Rocktober Fest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you still have room in your car for Rocktober Fest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narc</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/comment-page-1/#comment-3051</link>
		<dc:creator>Narc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1149#comment-3051</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  

As an outside observer though, it seems a bit odd to basically completely bypass the E11 grade.  The only E11 I am aware of would be Rhapsody and the grade of that seems a bit in question.  It&#039;s like people coming out and proposing V16 for a boulder problem when there are hardly any V15s.  I often question these sorts of proposed grades (not that my opinion counts for much).

I also don&#039;t really take 8a to task for suggesting downgrading, but rather the way they go about most of their suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  </p>
<p>As an outside observer though, it seems a bit odd to basically completely bypass the E11 grade.  The only E11 I am aware of would be Rhapsody and the grade of that seems a bit in question.  It&#8217;s like people coming out and proposing V16 for a boulder problem when there are hardly any V15s.  I often question these sorts of proposed grades (not that my opinion counts for much).</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t really take 8a to task for suggesting downgrading, but rather the way they go about most of their suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Cujes</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/10/climbing-news-notes-1012008/comment-page-1/#comment-3050</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Cujes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/?p=1149#comment-3050</guid>
		<description>Hey Narc, what&#039;s the deal with you putting a question mark after the grade of E12 on James Pearson&#039;s send? You&#039;re doing exactly what you have taken 8a.nu to task for in the past. James graded the route E12 7a. He didn&#039;t put a question mark after it. So that&#039;s the grade. You putting a question mark devalues James&#039; efforts whether you realize it or not. Unless you are going to put a question mark after each and every FA grade from here on out, I&#039;d say fix it!

Cheers
Lee Cujes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Narc, what&#8217;s the deal with you putting a question mark after the grade of E12 on James Pearson&#8217;s send? You&#8217;re doing exactly what you have taken 8a.nu to task for in the past. James graded the route E12 7a. He didn&#8217;t put a question mark after it. So that&#8217;s the grade. You putting a question mark devalues James&#8217; efforts whether you realize it or not. Unless you are going to put a question mark after each and every FA grade from here on out, I&#8217;d say fix it!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Lee Cujes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

