<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carlo Traversi Paths Of Glory (V12) FA Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video/</link>
	<description>So obsessed with climbing it hurts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Narc</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>The Narc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>Interesting indeed.  I appreciate both of you offering your first hand insights.

Perhaps most of Carlo&#039;s reaction is due to the comments he heard while at the boulder and not so much yours JE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting indeed.  I appreciate both of you offering your first hand insights.</p>
<p>Perhaps most of Carlo&#8217;s reaction is due to the comments he heard while at the boulder and not so much yours JE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JE</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>JE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>Carlo, I&#039;m not trying to be critical at all. I think you took my comments the wrong way.  In fact, although I have tried Stanley Kubrick, I never looked at the roof much, so I don&#039;t know either way. I was just trying to add some first hand information to the discussion.  I would love to see it for myself sometime.  I never called your problem a &quot;pile of shit&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlo, I&#8217;m not trying to be critical at all. I think you took my comments the wrong way.  In fact, although I have tried Stanley Kubrick, I never looked at the roof much, so I don&#8217;t know either way. I was just trying to add some first hand information to the discussion.  I would love to see it for myself sometime.  I never called your problem a &#8220;pile of shit&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>Only one hold was broken to my knowledge and the second ascent is yet to be accomplished.  Daniel completed a right variation to the problem, but did not complete the direct topout.  I thought the problem had good quality rock on it.  That jug in the middle was bound to break, but everything else was extremely solid when I climbed it.  More holds have broken off of Dark Waters and no one goes around calling it a pile of shit.  This is a touchy subject for me, not because I put the problem up, but rather I feel that comments made that day by certain individuals might lead to less people trying it in the future.  I thought it was a fun climb, it might be soft, it might be stiff, but I think a lot of people could have fun on it if they just take the time to go up and check it out.  How many roof climbs do you see like that in Colorado?  Not many.  Accept it for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only one hold was broken to my knowledge and the second ascent is yet to be accomplished.  Daniel completed a right variation to the problem, but did not complete the direct topout.  I thought the problem had good quality rock on it.  That jug in the middle was bound to break, but everything else was extremely solid when I climbed it.  More holds have broken off of Dark Waters and no one goes around calling it a pile of shit.  This is a touchy subject for me, not because I put the problem up, but rather I feel that comments made that day by certain individuals might lead to less people trying it in the future.  I thought it was a fun climb, it might be soft, it might be stiff, but I think a lot of people could have fun on it if they just take the time to go up and check it out.  How many roof climbs do you see like that in Colorado?  Not many.  Accept it for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JE</title>
		<link>http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video/comment-page-1/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>JE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbingnarc.com/2008/05/carlo-traversi-paths-of-glory-v12-fa-video#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>Daniels commets were based on the fact that he and Ty broke off a number of holds, including the jug in the middle of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniels commets were based on the fact that he and Ty broke off a number of holds, including the jug in the middle of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

